|
|
61-79-list-digest Sunday, May 10 1998 Volume 02 : Number 261 ======================================================================= Ford Truck Enthusiasts - 1961-1979 Trucks and Vans Visit our web site: http://www.ford-trucks.com/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe, send email to: majordomo with the words "unsubscribe 61-79-list-digest" in the body of the message. ======================================================================= In this issue: FTE 61-79 - Pigeon Forge FTE 61-79 - Axle Spacers FTE 61-79 - Re: twin piston calipers FTE 61-79 - Re: engine > FTE 61-79 - Re: Sunday Breakfast RE: FTE 61-79 - After Market Sway bars RE: FTE 61-79 - Traction Bars Re: FTE 61-79 - Pigeon Forge FTE 61-79 - Rope seal FTE 61-79 - A Soapbox Rant on Back Pressure. FTE 61-79 - New Lincoln SUV FTE 61-79 - Steering Wheel Hub FTE 61-79 - U Joints FTE 61-79 - FE vs. 385 ??? RE: FTE 61-79 - engine > RE: FTE 61-79 - '69 F-250 FTE 61-79 - trans numbers Re: FTE 61-79 - trans numbers FTE 61-79 - Permission to use your pictures. FTE 61-79 - Badges for the show Re: FTE 61-79 - FE vs. 385 ??? Re: FTE 61-79 - FE vs. 385 ??? Re: FTE 61-79 - My front leaf springs > ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 06:22:07 -0400 From: "Melayne Arnold" Subject: FTE 61-79 - Pigeon Forge Ken, Sunday morning is fine by me.We're going Thurs. evening and staying till Sun. Any time others want is fine with us. Are you going to have the booth? I'd like to be able to meet everyone before the end of the show. (SWMBO sez that I'd feel pretty dumb getiing into a tug of war over a piece of chrome on Saturday and then find out it was with another list member on Sunday). Stoney = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 09:42:11 EDT From: BDIJXS Subject: FTE 61-79 - Axle Spacers I just disassembled a Dana 60-2 (semi-floating) with a Power-Lok unit. I'm trying to figure out exactly what the little spacers between the axles do. Each one is about an inch long with one end that has a flange that butts up to end of each axle. The Power-Lok unit fits right into the full-floating (3/4 ton) axle that I am upgrading to. Does anyone know if these spacers are required for the full-floating Dana 60 Power-Lok application? If so, any idea on what kind of clearances there should be? Thanks! Colorado Jeff = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 10:08:59 EDT From: BDIJXS Subject: FTE 61-79 - Re: twin piston calipers Hey Ox, Just went through the dual piston deal you are going through. I found it was cheaper to get the rebuilt caliper unit than to buy the piston kits and do it myself! The rebuilt units were $45 plus a $5 core....I think they call them an "unloaded" unit, meaning no brake shoes included.... Good luck, Colorado Jeff = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 10:09:24 EDT From: BDIJXS Subject: FTE 61-79 - Re: engine > Hey Eric, If you picked up the entire engine/transmission assembly out of the 77, you did good. Now, you just need to figure out the difference between the frame cross members between the two rigs. I don't know about the 4x2's, but it looks like the crossmember that the transmission bolts to in the 4x4's is interchangeable between these two years. Sounds like you'll need a new steering column as well to replace your "three on the tree" setup with the automatic selector. Since a lot of the 67's came stock with the FE/Auto setup, you should be able to pick up a set of the correct motor mounts no problem from the junkyards.... Not much help, but good luck! Colorado Jeff = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 10:10:19 EDT From: BDIJXS Subject: FTE 61-79 - Re: Sunday Breakfast Hi Ken, Count me in on the Sunday AM deal.... Colorado Jeff = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 10:28:55 -0500 From: "Bear" Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - After Market Sway bars Thank you very much. That was a big help! E-mail : bear269 Please view my home page at: http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.isl.net/~bear269/home - -----Original Message----- From: owner-61-79-list [mailto:owner-61-79-list Sent: Saturday, May 09, 1998 11:25 AM To: 61-79-list Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - After Market Sway bars > From: "Bear" > Subject: FTE 61-79 - After Market Sway bars > Date: Sat, 9 May 1998 00:06:58 -0500 > I was looking in a catalog and I saw after market sway bars. I was > wondering: What are they supposed to do, how do they work and are > they worth the money? I was looking into getting the front and rear > ones... Ever see one of them fancy custom cars the LA gang guys build that go up and down and bounce all over............well sway bars........Ok, not really, sway bars are actually "Anti-Sway" bars and when one wheel on an axle (front or rear) moves the anti-sway bar forces the other side to move too but with some amount of lag built in to the spring rate of the sway bar. All it is is a torsion bar with arms. The primary purpose is to keep the body more level in turns. My bronco has them front and rear and it corners like a Ferrari but if I ever go to Moab, I'll carry my tools with me and take them off before I go on the trails :-) 78 F-150, 2wd, 460, C-6, 235's 78 Bronco 351M, Np 435, Np 205, 33's 78 Lincoln Town Car, 460, C-6, 19.5' long! - -- Gary -- = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 12:06:09 -0400 From: Sleddog Subject: RE: FTE 61-79 - Traction Bars FWIW, take a good estimate of what the engine makes at the crank, and reduce that by 10% to 20%. this is what is assumed in vehicle calculations when the true efficiency of the drivetrain is not known. an automatic will decrease shock load, but increase the torque. a manual is opposite of course. (assuming equal gear ratios, which of course may not be the case. this is because a torque converter increases torque at high relative engine to wheel speed difference.) so if your 428 makes 410 #ft torque, then at the rear wheel, about 320-370 #ft of torque may be available if the final drive ratio is 1:1 with the engine. so, if the final drive ratio is 2.75 first gear, and 2:1 transfer case (assuming 4x4 low range) and 4.10 rear gears, the final ratio is 22.55. so, torque would be 80% * 22.55 * 410(esitmated engine torque) = about 7,400 #ft at the axles. now, another factor applies, which is quite high for trucks in general. the driveline inertia. this reduces it quite a bit. how much inertia? hell, i don't know! also tire dia reduce's it. here's the actual technical equation: Ta=Fx*r+Lw*Aw=(Td-(Id*Ad)Nf where: Ta=torque on the axles Fx=tractive force at the ground (lbs) r= wheel radius Iw=inertia of wheels and axles Aw=rotation acceleration of the wheels > Id=inertia of driveshaft Ad=rotational acceleration of driveshaft Nf=final drive ratio Fx=is an even more complex eqation with more "unknowns". i think you can assume about 60-80% of the rear axle wheight for this number. it changes depending upon weight transfer, center of gravity, inertia of sprung, unsprung parts, tire traction, and just about everything else! anyway, on my pull truck i have 1"od x 1/8"wall (if i remember correctly) round DOM tubing. i welded in nuts at each end one with a LH thread, one RH thread. used 3/4 thread heim jounts and connected one end to axle bottom and one end to frame. the tube is mounted so that from side of vehicle the tubes and drive shaft are in almost the same exact plane. similiar to rancho's set, but better IMHO. sleddog - ---------- From: BDIJXS[SMTP:BDIJXS Sent: Saturday, May 09, 1998 7:58 PM To: 61-79-list Subject: FTE 61-79 - Traction Bars Can anyone give me good upper estimate on how much torque would be measured at the rear wheels for a good, strong-running 428? I just need an upper ballpark figure here....I think that with that number, I can calculate about how much force will be transmitted to a set of traction bars (I'm trying to eliminate wrap-up), and therefore decide on what diameter they should be and what the brackets I'm going to make need to be able to handle..... Thanks! Colorado Jeff = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 12:40:31 -0400 From: Ken Payne Subject: Re: FTE 61-79 - Pigeon Forge At 06:22 AM 5/10/98 -0400, you wrote: >Ken, > Sunday morning is fine by me.We're going Thurs. evening and staying till >Sun. Any time others want is fine with us. Are you going to have the booth? We'll a booth. I'm printing out the banner for it right now. Directions to the pavilion for the Sunday breakfast will be at the booth. >I'd like to be able to meet everyone before the end of the show. (SWMBO sez >that I'd feel pretty dumb getiing into a tug of war over a piece of chrome >on Saturday and then find out it was with another list member on Sunday). > >Stoney We're planning on meeting Saturday in front of the convention center around 10. Hope to see you there. Tug of war? Heck, when it comes to getting a new grill for my 67 I have no shame! Ken Payne CoAdmin, Ford Truck Enthusiasts http://www.ford-trucks.com = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 08:49:48 -0800 From: "Erik Marquez" Subject: FTE 61-79 - Rope seal >> Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 20:52:30 -0400 >> From: "THE PAVIES'" >> Subject: FTE 61-79 - 360 Seal Replacement > >> look-see at whats really in there. But it's hard to believe Ford >> used rope as an oil seal. Sounds like something you'd use as an >> emergency temporary fix but not as something permanent. Maybe I can >> wind some string around and stick gum on it. SNIP >The rope seals were very durable but very difficult to replace and >not too forgiving of worn bearings but were used by many manufactures >back then. I haven't seen one in so long I can't remember if there >is any rubber parts to them but there was no rod so thay can't be >driven out like the rubber ones, they have to be pulled out or the > engine has to be pulled and worked on on a stand. > >78 F-150, 2wd, 460, C-6, 235's >78 Bronco 351M, Np 435, Np 205, 33's >78 Lincoln Town Car, 460, C-6, 19.5' long! > >- -- Gary -- Gary is spot on, those rope seals do/did work well when installed correctly, as with the rubber type, when replacing the seal (rubber grab with a pliers, rope insert a small sheet metal screw into the end and pull that) have a helper S L O W L Y turn the motor over in the same direction you are tring to pull the seal out. This way the crank will help "push" the seal out. BTW FELPRO still markets both types of seals, some one must still buy them. Erik Marquez 78 Bronco > bronco78 http://www.ford-trucks.com//lc/lc.php?action=do&link=http://www.mosquitonet.com/~bronco78 = Ford Truck Enthusiasts ============================================== Send posts to: 61-79-list Send unsubscribe requests to: majordomo "unsubscribe 61-79-list" in the message body. ======================================================================= ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 11:37:25 -0700 From: "Chris Samuel" Subject: FTE 61-79 - A Soapbox Rant on Back Pressure. On Soap Box. Mike Schwall wrote: "I used to have more torque, but I put on full length 1 1/2" primary headers and 2 1/4" dual .... To access the rest of this feature you must be a logged in Registered User Of Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Registration is free, easy and gives you access to more features.
If you are already logged in and are seeing this message, your web browser is blocking session
cookies. Change your browser cookie settings to allow session cookies.
Advertising -
Terms of Use - Privacy Policy -
Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company. |